Discover More
The ESA Edit That Could Affect an $800 Million Species Offset Market and Undermine Decades of Tribal Salmon Recovery
Last month, EPIC submitted detailed public comments opposing a proposed federal rule that would weaken the Endangered Species Act by removing habitat destruction from the definition of "harm." If the Rule goes through, it has profound implications for the restoration economy and Tribal communities.
Comment: Opposition to the Proposed Rule to Rescind the Definition of "Harm" Under the Endangered Species Act
Comment: Opposition to the Proposed Rule to Rescind the Definition of "Harm" Under the Endangered Species Act
Federal Policy Shifts Impact Tribal Funding Access and Environmental Restoration
Restoring Los Angeles: Opportunities for Indigenous Leadership After Wildfires
EPIC submits ESA Sec. 4D comments to increase tribal sovereignty in natural resources
Versatile purpose: New IRT workbooks offer additional resources for Tribal Compensatory Mitigation
New IRT workbooks offer resources for tribal compensatory mitigation
Tribal Compensatory Mitigation
Sovereignty, Data and Maps: How accurately represented are Tribes in water utility service area boundaries data?
New Report: Promoting Tribal Roles in Providing Compensatory Mitigation Offsets
Promoting Tribal Roles in Providing Compensatory Mitigation Offsets
Breaking News: Species Banking ANPR Released
Yesterday, the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) released an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) on Compensatory Mitigation Mechanisms. We provide initial reactions here.
Three changes to the mitigation rule to enhance successful tribal compensatory mitigation programs
How can tribes use mitigation banking for economic development?
How can tribes use mitigation banking for economic development?
Visualizing Tribal Mitigation Opportunities in the Colorado River Basin
An interview with EPIC tribal mitigation fellow, Mariah Black Bird
An interview with Tribal Mitigation Fellow Mariah Black Bird
